Matthew 15
Tradition and the command of God
Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem, saying, “Why do your disciples disobey the tradition of the elders? For they don’t wash their hands when they eat bread.”
He answered them, “Why do you also disobey the commandment of God because of your tradition? For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him be put to death.’ But you say, ‘Whoever may tell his father or his mother, “Whatever help you might otherwise have gotten from me is a gift devoted to God,” he shall not honor his father or mother.’ You have made the commandment of God void because of your tradition. You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, ‘These people draw near to me with their mouth, and honor me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. And they worship me in vain, teaching as doctrine rules made by men.’”
Pharisees and scribes from Jerusalem ask why Jesus' disciples break the tradition of the elders by eating without washing their hands. Jesus retorts that they break God's own command through their tradition, citing a practice by which a person could declare his property 'a gift' dedicated to God and so avoid supporting his parents.
-
Scripture connection · Quotation
Matthew 15:7–9 quotes Isaiah 29:13
The Lord said, “Because this people draws near with their mouth and honors me with their lips, but they have removed their heart far from me, and their fear of me is a commandment of men which has been taught;
Isaiah 29:13 · WEB Isaiah criticised worship that was only outward. Jesus uses it against traditions that override God's commands.
What does this mean?
The 'tradition of the elders' was the body of teaching handed down orally by the Pharisees to apply the Law to daily life; much of it was later written down in the Mishnah, around AD 200. 'It is a gift' (KJV) refers to a vow of the kind Mark calls 'Corban' (Mark 7:11).
Historical context
The handwashing concerned ritual purity, not hygiene: the Pharisees urged extending priestly purity practices into everyday meals. Vows dedicating property to God were binding, and later rabbis debated whether such vows could be released when they harmed parents.
Why does it matter?
The dispute is about authority: whose interpretation of God's will is binding. The delegation 'from Jerusalem' signals that opposition is now coming from the centre.
Editorial notes, not scripture.